Prof Ian Gilmore: Legalise heroin and cocaine to cut crime and improve health | Mail Online

Legalise heroin and cocaine to cut crime and improve health, top doctor says

Sophie Borland
Last updated at 12:40 PM on 17th August 2010

Personal drug use should be legalised to cut crime and improve health, a top doctor has said.

Professor Sir Ian Gilmore, the outgoing president of the Royal College of Physicians, suggested that relaxing the law on possessing substances such as heroin, cocaine and cannabis would not increase the number of addicts.

This could save vast amounts of taxpayers’ money, he suggests. 


Cocaine is an addictive Class A drug and possession can lead to seven years in jail. Now a leading doctor has called for it to be decriminalised along with other illicit drugs

Campaigners in favour of legalising drugs and making them available for free on the NHS claim it would cut crime as addicts would no longer steal to fund their habit.

They also believe that it would lower rates of diseases such as HIV, as users would not share infected needles because clean equipment would be provided.

Sir Ian, who worked as a liver specialist, said: ‘Every day in our hospital wards we see drug addicts with infections from dirty needles, we see heroin addicts with complication from contaminated drugs.’

The expert said he therefore fully supported remarks made by Britain’s leading barrister, who last month demanded a review of drug laws.

‘I personally back the chairman of the UK Bar Council, Nicholas Green QC, when he calls for drug laws to be reconsidered with a view to decriminalising illicit drugs use,’ he said.

‘This could drastically reduce crime and improve health.’ 


Professor Sir Ian Gilmore claims relaxing the law on drugs would be beneficial to society – and would not increase the number of addicts

Speaking to the BBC this morning, he added: ‘Everyone who has looked at this in a serious and sustained way
concludes that the present policy of prohibition is not a success.

‘There are really strong arguments to look again.’

Others argue that such a move would mean less chance of users being harmed by other substances taken with the drugs.

A significant proportion of heroin deaths are believed to be caused by an overdose of quinine, which dealers often combine with the class A drug to make it appear as though there is more.

But critics warned that Sir Ian’s views were ‘misguided’ because they encouraged drug use.

David Green, director of thinktank Civitas, said: ‘Legalising drugs would simply result in a lot more people taking them.

‘The general consensus from research is that drug-taking is part of a dysfunctional life which involves crime. The argument that crime rates would go down is misguided.’

He added: ‘I cannot see how public health would be improved.

‘If it is a lot easier to take substances, there would be more people on drugs and therefore requiring medical attention  –  so overall health rates would deteriorate.’

Anders Ulstein, of the Europe Against Drugs pressure group, said: ‘Legalising drug use will not solve any problems. 

‘Lots of people appear to have a very ideological stance on this without coming up with replacement methods of stopping people from taking drugs. This debate is very harmful.’ 

Sir Ian’s remarks were welcomed by groups campaigning for reforms in drugs law.





All polls Click to view yesterday’s poll results

Danny Kushlick of Transform, a think tank which believes that making
substances illegal causes more harm, said: ‘Sir Ian’s statement is yet
another nail in prohibition’s coffin.

‘Physicians are duty bound to speak out if the outcomes show that prohibition causes more harm than it reduces.’

Sir Ian made his remarks in a final email to colleagues before standing down as president of the Royal College of Physicians this month.

But his relaxed attitude on the availability on drugs contrasts sharply to his views on alcohol.

He accused Labour ministers of ‘irresponsibility’ for failing to stop supermarkets from selling cheap booze.

And he said the party’s 24-hour drinking laws would allow pubs and bars to put profits before customers’ health.

His comments on drugs follow those of Professor David Nutt last month.

Professor Nutt, who was sacked as the Labour government’s top drugs adviser after saying alcohol was more harmful than ecstasy, said Britain needed a radical new approach to drugs laws, which he said could include the regulated sale of some drugs.

Share this article:

Add your comments

Comments (158)

Here’s what readers have had to say so far. Why not add your thoughts below,
or debate this issue live on our message boards.

The comments below have not been moderated.

Idiocy. But that’s what the Western countries have been reduced to; pure idiocy.

– Frank LeMoyne, United States of Obama, 17/8/2010 14:38

Click to rate


Report abuse

stupid moron

– Marvelous, South Korea, Expat, 17/8/2010 14:36

Click to rate


Report abuse

maybe we should also legalise speding and drunk driving – more might die bt there would be savings for law enforcement

– david, bristol, 17/8/2010 14:34

Click to rate


Report abuse

With our tough laws on hard drugs – Yahsayer.

These tough laws are – where? Half the Oxford police force raided a a drug farm and… and gave the “farmer” a caution. Drug pushers are let off with cautions, drug abusers are given extra social security, and fantasists like Ian Gilmore believe that we need a free hand in the drugs market?

WHAT WE NEED is real punishment for producers, mules and dealers. WHAT WE NEED is to stop cosseting users. WHAT WE NEED is the National Institute of Dogooders, who SAY that cheap booze is responsible for all alcohol abuse, whilst crying out that cannabis does no harm, apart from schizophrenia and paranoia, that heroine doesn’t destroy the majority of idiots who use it… should all be exported to somewhere they can live their dream lives and not have any affect on others.

WHAT WE NEED is young people being raised to understand responsibility, to recognize their duty to others, not just to themselves. WHAT WE NEED is a responsible society. NO CHANCE!

– James, From the side of a Cotdwold hill, 17/8/2010 14:33

Click to rate


Report abuse

Since when did anyone on this earth EVER have authority over what you can or can’t put in you’re OWN body, that’s the real question?

Anyway, I totally agree with Ian Gilmore all drugs should be recognized as lawful.

Cannabis and poppy fields wouldn’t grow if God didn’t want them to either, ever thought about that??

– Dances with bunnies, London, UK, 17/8/2010 14:30

Click to rate


Report abuse

Do you know who finances the Al-Quaeda or even the Mafias of South America ? It’s the flawed attitude of West towards the drugs. They get paid in hard currency for the crop, and buy weapons to keep their areas out of bounds from the civilised world. Its vicious cycle.

– Pankaj, Jammu India, 17/8/2010 14:25

Click to rate


Report abuse

The views expressed in the contents above are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of MailOnline.

Add your comment


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s